Saturday, March 19, 2011

In Sri Lanka, seeking to square the circle


Photo courtesy: Yamuni Rashmika

By K. Venkataramanan | The Hindu
.............................................................................................................................................................................................

India made an unsuccessful effort to resolve the ‘cohabitation' crisis in Sri Lanka between President Chandrika Kumaratunga and Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe late in 2003 by suggesting that the Defence portfolio be split so that he could have effective control over military affairs in the north and east as he remained in charge of the stalled peace process.

Indian High Commissioner Nirupam Sen's suggestion did not convince Mr. Wickremesinghe, from whose Cabinet the Defence, Interior and Mass Commuication portfolios were taken away by Ms. Kumaratunga in November 2003. However, according to the contents of a conversation between Milinda Moragoda, a senior Cabinet Minister who was coordinating the peace process from the government side, and Jeffrey J. Lunstead, the U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka, the Prime Minister had no objection to India trying to sell the proposal to the President while she was in Islamabad for the SAARC summit in January 2004.


Mr. Lunstead reported the development in a cable dated December 29, 2003 (12953: confidential), accessed by The Hindu through WikiLeaks. The context was the lengthy stalemate in the peace process after the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) withdrew from the peace talks in April 2003 and, six months and hundreds of ceasefire violations later, came up, on October 31, with a controversial proposal for an ‘Interim Self-Governing Authority' for the northeast. Four days later, Ms. Kumaratunga, marginalised in the decision-making regarding the peace process and left with the feeling that her presidency was not given the respect it deserved, divested the Defence, Interior and Information Ministers of their portfolios. This resulted in the ‘cohabitation crisis' reaching a point of no-return. Mr. Wickremesinghe thought he could not pursue peace without control over the military – as maintaining the ceasefire was the foundation of the process – and believed that a fresh parliamentary election was the only way out.

On December 26, Mr. Moragoda met Mr. Lunstead to review his upcoming visit to the U.S. and told the latter that the only effort to resolve the political stalemate “was a proposal being brokered by Indian High Commissioner Sen following his consultations in Delhi.” The Ambassador said: “Sen was pushing the idea that the regional commands (for the North and the East, presumably) could be carved out of the Defense Ministry and put under Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe's control. This would give him the operational control he needed to resume the peace negotiations. Milinda [Moragoda] did not know if this idea would fly. Even the PM was not fully convinced it was useful, but he was willing to let Sen try it out on the President. Milinda thought that the Indians would push this idea with President Chandrika Bandarnaike Kumaratunga (CBK) at the SAARC summit in Islamabad in early January.”

In a cable sent two days later, on December 31, 2003, containing a report on the handing over of a letter from Secretary of State Colin Powell to Mr. Wickremesinghe (12992: confidential), Mr. Lunstead said he had asked the Prime Minister if there was any chance of Mr. Sen's initiative succeeding. “PM said he did not think this would go anywhere, and even if he liked it, he did not think the Service Chiefs would accept it.”

Chandrika willing

According to a cable sent on January 5, 2004, Mr. Lunstead spoke on January 2 to Mr. Sen, who, “without any prompting,” said: “The technical means of squaring the circle are available. The problem is that Ranil does not want that much – he wants everything. She (the president) is willing to compromise, the problem now is his objection to accepting any piecemeal solution” (13027: confidential).

Mr. Sen explained that the President was looking for a way out by offering to delegate a number of defence matters to the Prime Minister, “but the PM was trying to get everything.” He added that External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha and Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee might raise the issue with the President during the SAARC summit.

Throwing light on what exactly Ms. Kumaratunga's ‘way out' was, Mr. Lunstead said in another part of the same cable, while recounting his meeting with Ms. Kumaratunga to deliver a separate letter from Mr. Powell, that she was willing to make Mr. Wickremesinghe Minister of National Security and turn over to him parts of the Defence portfolio related to the peace process.

Mr. Lunstead's own comments show that the U.S. did believe that the Prime Minister could not be blamed for the impasse, but at the same time he should be told that he should “give some meaningful role to the President, if he expects her to give him back operational control over defense.”

“We have urged her to compromise, and will continue to do so, but she will not listen to us if we ask her to consent to her own political oblivion,” he observed.

When Mr. Moragoda said on December 26 that during his U.S. visit he planned to convey to the Deputy Secretary [Richard Armitage] that the international community should understand that the President caused the crisis and was prolonging it with her obstinacy, Mr. Lunstead replied that the U.S. understood that the President had caused the crisis but its public statements had to be relatively even-handed.

The Indian efforts, however, did not bear fruit as Ms. Kumaratunga dissolved Parliament soon and called fresh elections that were held in April 2004 and brought her party back to power.

© The Hindu

Read More

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, March 19, 2011

5,653 cases of ‘disappeared’ pending in Sri Lanka: Forum-Asia at 16th session of UNHRC



Tamil Net
.............................................................................................................................................................................................

Sri Lanka government is yet to provide clarification on 5,653 outstanding cases of disappeared persons and it has not responded positively to requests to visit the country in this regard by UN Rapporteurs, said Pooja Patel, while delivering her oral statement on behalf of Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM –ASIA) in the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva on Tuesday.

Increased militarization in the Northeast has created an environment of intense insecurity for resettled communities especially for female-headed families who are particularly vulnerable to sexual exploitation and abuse, Ms. Patel pointed out.


Participating the 16th sessions of the UNHRC, Ms Patel said that Sri Lanka did not positively respond to Special Rapporteur on Independence of Judges and Lawyers, Independent Expert on Minority Rights (2007/2009), Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary disappearances (2006,2007,2008 and 2009), Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders (2008) and Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression (2009), to visit the island.

She was also referring to the Systematic erosion of democratic structures and institutions, the removal of safeguards against the concentration of power on the Executive President through the 18th Amendment to the Constitution and the placement of the NGO Secretariat under the Ministry of Defence.

© Tamil Net

Read More

Bookmark and Share

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Sri Lanka's Polls Chief regrets misuse of state media



Daily Mirror
.............................................................................................................................................................................................

Elections Commissioner Dayananda Dissanayake said yesterday the misuse of state resources including the state-owned media and the manner in which some political parties and their supporters had conducted themselves before and on the date of the poll was regrettable.

He said several incidents of thuggery were reported during the period between nomination day and Election Day.

“One marked feature of the election campaign was the competition even among candidates of the same party for preference votes.


However, it was possible to conduct the poll in a fairly pleasant atmosphere when compared with previous local council elections,” he said in his statement at the conclusion of the elections.

“Nominations of candidates for 301 local authorities comprising four Municipal Councils, 39 Urban Councils and 258 Pradeshiya Sabhas took place from January 20 to January 27. A total of 2,047 nomination papers were received of which 1,595 were accepted and 452 rejected for various reasons,” he said.

Mr. Dissanayake said some of the affected parties sought legal remedy in regard to 68 rejected nominations.

“I wish to thank District Returning Officers, Deputy, Senior Assistant and Assistant Commissioners of the districts who performed a heavy task in a short period in the midst of various obstacles. The services rendered by Divisional Secretaries at the Divisional level and Grama Niladharis at the village level have to be appreciated. I highly value the services rendered in managing the organizational work at the Elections Secretariat by the Additional Commissioners, Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Accountants, Staff Officers in the Computer Division, Administrative Officer and the Consultants who have been assisting the Department at various times,” he said.

Mr. Dissanayake said the Police Department was called upon to provide security at all polling stations and to election staff; voters and candidates. “The Sri Lanka Police, which understood its responsibility in this connection, gave of their best in providing the security required. My thanks go to the Police Department, Civil Security Force, Special Task Force and the Sri Lanka Army for the services rendered in this connection. A word of thanks is also due to the Government Printer and his staff for assisting the Department by executing all the printing requirements in time and also the staff of the Ceylon Electricity Board, Sri Lanka Telecom, Ceylon Petroleum Corporation and the Government Factory for executing our demands expeditiously,” he said.

“I also appreciate the services rendered by the Sri Lanka Government Railway, Sri Lanka Transport Board and Private Bus Operators by providing transport facilities to the poll staff and voters. Many polling stations were situated in religious premises and on private lands. I thank the owners of such premises for readily releasing the facilities,” Mr. Dissanayake said. “The officers who assisted in scrutinizing the results of the election prepared by the Returning Officers, the staff of the University of Colombo School of computing who facilitated the release of the results to the media and the Sri Lanka Telecom which provided the communication facility in this connection and helped in releasing the results to the public. The active participation by PAFFREL and CMEV and other non-governmental organizations, which rendered a much needed service in ensuring a free and fair election was invaluable and finally, I take this opportunity to thank the leaders and secretaries of political parties, candidates and the voters who co-operated with me in conducting a peaceful, free and fair election.”

© Daily Mirror

Read More

Bookmark and Share
© 2009 - 2014 Journalists for Democracy in Sri Lanka

  © Blogger template 'Fly Away' by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP