By Matthew Russell Lee | Inner City Press
.............................................................................................................................................................................................
The siege came six days after Weerawansa urged crowds to take UN staff hostage. Inner City Press on June 30 and July 2 asked UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon's Associate Spokesperson Farhan Haq for Ban's response.
On June 30, Haq said Weerawansa's threat may have been misquoted, and was in any event merely “individual.”
Inner City Press asked a very senior UN official about the threat and was told it was a “Gandhian” threat.
On July 2, when Inner City Press asked why the UN would minimize a government minister's threat against UN staff as “individual,” Haq claimed that an apology might be forthcoming from the government and told Inner City Press, "I will let you know if something like that comes through."
On July 3, Weerawansa made clear he was not misquoted, and the threat was not individual. Inner City Press published stories on July 3, 4 and 5. Ban Ki-moon, in Jamaica, said nothing. Haq and his Office sent nothing.
On July 6, UN staff were taken hostage, and the Sri Lankan government did nothing to stop it.
It is called a government endorsed and protected action against UN staff.
While Weerawansa and some Sinhalese activists are calling on Ban to be “impeached” for his belated and begrudging naming of a panel to advise him on Sri Lankan war crimes, others including UN staff and supporters point to other reasons: the inexplicable delay, and this failure to perform the most basic part of the UN S-G job, to protect or at least speak up for UN staff in the field.
© Inner City Press
No comments:
Post a Comment